Arab parties in Israeli election: The balance of power?

Arab parties in the Israeli election could emerge as the decisive factor in determining the next governing coalition. As polls suggest neither Benjamin Netanyahu's right-wing alliance nor Gadi Eisenkot's 'Change Bloc' possesses a clear parliamentary majority, the 13 to 14 seats potentially held by Arab-majority lists may become critical. This political deadlock forces a choice between breaking long-standing pledges or forming unexpected alliances. This article examines the shifting role of Arab-Israeli voters, the strategic approaches of key party leaders, and the heightened social tensions following the October 7 attacks.

By · 6 min read
Arab parties in Israeli election: The balance of power?

Why are Arab parties considered potential kingmakers?

Arab parties could hold the balance of power because current polling indicates a fragmented Knesset where no single major bloc has a guaranteed path to a majority. According to recent opinion polls, both Benjamin Netanyahu’s religious-nationalist coalition and Gadi Eisenkot’s center-right 'Change Bloc' are projected to secure approximately 50 seats each out of the 120 available in the Israeli parliament.

With 13 or 14 seats expected to go to Arab-majority groupings, these representatives may hold the deciding votes required to form a government. This creates a significant political dilemma for the opposition. While the Change Bloc aims to replace the current administration, its leader, former military chief Gadi Eisenkot, has so far ruled out entering a coalition with Arab parties, citing a lack of shared values.

For anti-Netanyahu parties to succeed, they must navigate two difficult paths: either breaking previous commitments to avoid working with Arab lists or successfully negotiating with parties that have different ideological foundations. This tension is central to the upcoming vote, as the ability to form a stable majority will depend on whether these blocs can find common ground or if the deadlock continues.

How are different Arab political groups approaching the election?

The Arab political landscape is divided between groups seeking direct influence through government participation and those aiming to strengthen the opposition. Two primary entities represent these differing strategies: the United Arab List and the Joint Arab List.

Strategic differences: Influence vs. Representation

Mansour Abbas, leader of the United Arab List, has adopted a pragmatic approach focused on securing tangible benefits for Arab citizens. Unlike traditional nationalist stances, Abbas has demonstrated a willingness to join Jewish-led coalitions, having previously served as a minister in the Naftali Bennett government. For the current election, his party has even placed a Jewish former police official, Yoav Segalovitz, in the number two position on its slate. Abbas argues that parliamentary representation alone is insufficient and that his goal is to reach a position of actual influence to solve community problems.

In contrast, the Joint Arab List—comprising Hadash, Balad, and Taal—maintains a more ideological stance. This coalition of secular parties advocates for equal rights, an end to the military occupation of Palestinian territories, and a two-state solution. Rather than seeking cabinet positions, the Joint List aims to act as an electoral 'safety net' for the opposition, providing support for key policies in exchange for concessions that protect Arab interests and challenge the current government's direction.

What impact has the conflict in Gaza had on Arab-Israeli society?

The political and social environment for Arab Israelis has been profoundly altered by the Hamas-led assault on October 7, 2023, and the subsequent war in Gaza. This period has seen an increase in hostility and mistrust directed toward the country's Arab minority, who comprise roughly one-fifth of the population.

Suha Salman Mousa of the Mossawa Centre reports that the space for freedom of speech has shrunk significantly for Arab citizens. She notes instances of people being dismissed from their jobs due to social media activity or protests against the war. Furthermore, civil society groups have highlighted what they describe as disproportionate budget cuts to Arab communities, though the government maintains these reductions are necessary to fund wartime defense and security requirements.

Social divisions have also been exacerbated by political rhetoric. Far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich has proposed 'Judaising' parts of the Galilee and Negev regions, a move likened to settlement expansion in the West Bank. This atmosphere of tension is compounded by reported instances of racially motivated attacks on Arab bus drivers and politicized campaigns against Arab medical professionals working in Israeli hospitals.

What are the primary domestic concerns for Arab voters?

Internal community safety, specifically the surge in violent gang crime, has become a dominant issue for Arab-Israeli voters. According to a poll by the Israel Democracy Institute, 53.5% of Arab citizens identified gang violence as the most important factor influencing their voting decision.

The scale of the violence is significant. Data from the Abraham Initiatives, a Jewish-Arab coexistence organization, shows that murders within the Arab community reached a record high of 252 last year. This figure is approximately five times higher than the number of Jewish Israelis killed during the same period. This disparity has led to widespread accusations of government inaction and a lack of effective policing.

Families affected by this violence express a deep sense of abandonment. In Jaffa, residents like Ziad Samouni, whose son was killed in a motorcycle shooting that remains unsolved, argue that the low rate of arrests creates a climate where perpetrators feel they can act with impunity. For many in the community, the urge to vote is driven by a desire to end this cycle of bloodshed and demand better security and justice from the state.

FAQ: Arab parties in Israeli election

Will Arab parties join the next government?

It depends on which bloc wins the most seats. Mansour Abbas and the United Arab List are actively seeking to join a government to gain influence, whereas the Joint Arab List prefers to support the opposition. The main hurdle is whether the 'Change Bloc' will abandon its stance against working with Arab parties.

How many seats are expected for Arab-majority lists?

Current political projections suggest that Arab-majority groupings could secure between 13 and 14 seats in the 120-seat Knesset. This number is significant because neither the Netanyahu-led coalition nor the Eisenkot-led opposition is expected to reach a majority on its own.

What is the main issue facing Arab-Israeli voters?

Internal security and gang violence are the most pressing concerns. A poll by the Israel Democracy Institute found that 53.5% of Arab citizens prioritize addressing the record-high murder rates within their communities when choosing which party to support in the election.

How is Benjamin Netanyahu campaigning against his rivals?

Netanyahu's campaign has used aggressive tactics, including billboards and AI-generated videos, to suggest that his opponents are aligned with Palestinian interests. One prominent billboard in Nazareth presents a choice between 'Right or Palestine,' attempting to frame the opposition as a threat to Israel's Jewish identity.

What is the difference between the United Arab List and the Joint List?

The United Arab List, led by Mansour Abbas, is more pragmatic and willing to collaborate with Jewish partners for political influence. The Joint List is a secular coalition that focuses on equal rights and ending the occupation, aiming to support the opposition rather than joining the government.

Key takeaways

  • Arab-majority parties are projected to hold 13 to 14 seats, potentially acting as kingmakers.
  • Neither Netanyahu's nor Eisenkot's blocs are expected to secure a clear parliamentary majority.
  • Mansour Abbas's United Arab List seeks direct government influence through pragmatic alliances.
  • The Joint Arab List focuses on providing an electoral safety net for the opposition.
  • Gang violence is a critical issue, with 53.5% of Arab voters prioritizing it.

Conclusion

The upcoming Israeli election presents a complex political landscape where Arab-majority parties may hold unprecedented leverage. While the ideological divide between the pragmatic approach of Mansour Abbas and the secular activism of the Joint List remains clear, both groups represent a significant voting bloc that cannot be ignored. As the country grapples with the aftermath of the October 7 attacks and rising internal crime, the decisions made by these voters and the subsequent coalition negotiations will shape the future of both Israeli governance and the social contract between the state and its Arab citizens.